<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for OverHa!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://overha.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://overha.com</link>
	<description>The Online Magazine for Everyday People</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:15:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LifeStyles SKYN Non Latex Condoms- 48 Ct by Florentino Alonso</title>
		<link>http://overha.com/doc/383522/lifestyle/comment-page-1/#comment-9794</link>
		<dc:creator>Florentino Alonso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overha.com/doc/383522/lifestyle/#comment-9794</guid>
		<description>From Trojan a no latex condom  that is safe to use with oils lubricants, really sensitive and the seller sent me 50 insteant of 48 Ct , very good buy, the first latex free condom i try !!!! i will buy again ....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Trojan a no latex condom  that is safe to use with oils lubricants, really sensitive and the seller sent me 50 insteant of 48 Ct , very good buy, the first latex free condom i try !!!! i will buy again &#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Business of Being Born by G. Bock</title>
		<link>http://overha.com/doc/093519/business/comment-page-1/#comment-9792</link>
		<dc:creator>G. Bock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overha.com/doc/093519/business/#comment-9792</guid>
		<description>This film starts a discussion that our society needs to have, for that I commend it to you. However, like many recent documentaries, it is one-sided (in favor of midwifery), makes some questionable claims, and &quot;indulges in the kind of stunt footage for which Michael Moore routinely gets slapped&quot; (Chicago Tribune review).  For example, when the medical establishment is represented in the film, the individuals are usually self-critical - supporting the film&#039;s agenda - and they are rarely given the opportunity to rebut the many claims made against the medical practice. For instance, the so-called experts in the film talk about the power disparity and physician paternalism in the OB clinic; they claim that many obstetricians don&#039;t have the patients&#039; best interests in mind and will do anything to drag them into the operating room to have a C-section (because this is most convenient for the doctors). This may be true in some cases, but it was not true in ours. Moreover, I find it hard to believe that in the modern climate of patient-centered practice that physicians on the whole are exercising this kind of influence and making these sorts of decisions. I think they are more interested in providing adequate patient care and creating a positive experience for each mom (which, by the way, has the upshot of increasing business and avoiding malpractice suits). In addition, the new buzz word among professionals and in popular literature these days is &quot;the birth plan.&quot; Pregnant mothers are encouraged to have one, which means spelling out exactly how they want the labor and delivery to go. Furthermore, in our experience, the delivery nurses were great, and they fulfilled the role that a midwife or a doula might. Finally, many of the talking heads in the film pontificate that women who go into the hospital to give birth are &quot;missing the experience&quot; of what it means to truly be a woman and give birth the natural way. I find this judgmental attitude almost as offensive as those who argue that epidurals are wrong on the basis that the Bible says women ought to feel pain in childbirth since the Fall. My advice: consider both midwifery and the hospital and go with the option that works best for you. You could have a good or bad experience either way, so ask around for recommendations. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This film starts a discussion that our society needs to have, for that I commend it to you. However, like many recent documentaries, it is one-sided (in favor of midwifery), makes some questionable claims, and &#8220;indulges in the kind of stunt footage for which Michael Moore routinely gets slapped&#8221; (Chicago Tribune review).  For example, when the medical establishment is represented in the film, the individuals are usually self-critical &#8211; supporting the film&#8217;s agenda &#8211; and they are rarely given the opportunity to rebut the many claims made against the medical practice. For instance, the so-called experts in the film talk about the power disparity and physician paternalism in the OB clinic; they claim that many obstetricians don&#8217;t have the patients&#8217; best interests in mind and will do anything to drag them into the operating room to have a C-section (because this is most convenient for the doctors). This may be true in some cases, but it was not true in ours. Moreover, I find it hard to believe that in the modern climate of patient-centered practice that physicians on the whole are exercising this kind of influence and making these sorts of decisions. I think they are more interested in providing adequate patient care and creating a positive experience for each mom (which, by the way, has the upshot of increasing business and avoiding malpractice suits). In addition, the new buzz word among professionals and in popular literature these days is &#8220;the birth plan.&#8221; Pregnant mothers are encouraged to have one, which means spelling out exactly how they want the labor and delivery to go. Furthermore, in our experience, the delivery nurses were great, and they fulfilled the role that a midwife or a doula might. Finally, many of the talking heads in the film pontificate that women who go into the hospital to give birth are &#8220;missing the experience&#8221; of what it means to truly be a woman and give birth the natural way. I find this judgmental attitude almost as offensive as those who argue that epidurals are wrong on the basis that the Bible says women ought to feel pain in childbirth since the Fall. My advice: consider both midwifery and the hospital and go with the option that works best for you. You could have a good or bad experience either way, so ask around for recommendations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LifeStyles SKYN Non Latex Condoms- 48 Ct by R. Peterson</title>
		<link>http://overha.com/doc/383522/lifestyle/comment-page-1/#comment-9793</link>
		<dc:creator>R. Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overha.com/doc/383522/lifestyle/#comment-9793</guid>
		<description>Lifestyles&#039; Skyns condoms are the best new condom we have tried! The new material allows for great sensitivity and are affordably priced. I put a little lube on the inside so that the condom slides on both the inside and the outside!
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;Highly recommended.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lifestyles&#8217; Skyns condoms are the best new condom we have tried! The new material allows for great sensitivity and are affordably priced. I put a little lube on the inside so that the condom slides on both the inside and the outside!</p>
<p>Highly recommended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Business of Being Born by findoutthebest</title>
		<link>http://overha.com/doc/093519/business/comment-page-1/#comment-9791</link>
		<dc:creator>findoutthebest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overha.com/doc/093519/business/#comment-9791</guid>
		<description>My wife and I have briefly talked about midwives vrs OBGYN&#039;s. My wife was delivered by a midwife at home. We are open to the idea of delivering at home and learning about the different options as well as the risks.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;We are awaiting our 2nd child.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;What I saw that I liked:
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;I enjoyed the openmindedness of the movie presenting a positive viewpoint of home births. Pointing out that women having a different perspective than a lot of OBGYN&#039;s. 
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;Being raised by an OBGYN I have had difficulties understanding the &quot;hospital is best&quot; perspective. I learned that an OBGYN was taught specific procedures, and tests that should be given to produce specific results. Med students are great at knowing different parts of the body, diagnosing illnesses, and working with urgent situations. They aren&#039;t trained adequately in the different ways the bodies healing systems work together. They don&#039;t view child birth as a natural process, but rather as a condition that needs to be treated. Due to this it can be hard for OBGYN&#039;s to believe in and understand alternative child birthing methods.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;I agree that hospitals birthing is limiting. Because of this some OB&#039;s can not be as personal as they could be. They are given standards that they follow irregardless of what the women may want. 
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;You can&#039;t blame OBGYN&#039;s. You can&#039;t blame hospitals. The whole system is full of quirks. But we can&#039;t live without them.  
&lt;br /&gt;   
&lt;br /&gt;Things I didn&#039;t like,
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;The movie talked about OBGYN&#039;s only being trained in doing surgeries all day long. It stated that they don&#039;t have the proper training to do OB Care with the patients. They don&#039;t always provide the emotional care that the mother needs during the birthing process. Midwifes can fulfill this need more easily. The movie did not list any benefits about hospital births and is therefore very biased.  
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;I didn&#039;t appreciate seeing a lady compeletly nude in the bathtub. I understand that it is part of the birthing process but they didn&#039;t need to show it in that way in the movie.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;It stated that OBGYN&#039;s don&#039;t offer as personalized care as mid wive&#039;s can. I think that depends on the individual mid wife and OB. In the movie the lady talked about having a midwife and and OB and her never thinking about going back to the OB. What I got out of this is that she had an impersonal OB and a personal midwife. 
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My wife and I have briefly talked about midwives vrs OBGYN&#8217;s. My wife was delivered by a midwife at home. We are open to the idea of delivering at home and learning about the different options as well as the risks.</p>
<p>We are awaiting our 2nd child.</p>
<p>What I saw that I liked:</p>
<p>I enjoyed the openmindedness of the movie presenting a positive viewpoint of home births. Pointing out that women having a different perspective than a lot of OBGYN&#8217;s. </p>
<p>Being raised by an OBGYN I have had difficulties understanding the &#8220;hospital is best&#8221; perspective. I learned that an OBGYN was taught specific procedures, and tests that should be given to produce specific results. Med students are great at knowing different parts of the body, diagnosing illnesses, and working with urgent situations. They aren&#8217;t trained adequately in the different ways the bodies healing systems work together. They don&#8217;t view child birth as a natural process, but rather as a condition that needs to be treated. Due to this it can be hard for OBGYN&#8217;s to believe in and understand alternative child birthing methods.</p>
<p>I agree that hospitals birthing is limiting. Because of this some OB&#8217;s can not be as personal as they could be. They are given standards that they follow irregardless of what the women may want. </p>
<p>You can&#8217;t blame OBGYN&#8217;s. You can&#8217;t blame hospitals. The whole system is full of quirks. But we can&#8217;t live without them.  </p>
<p>Things I didn&#8217;t like,</p>
<p>The movie talked about OBGYN&#8217;s only being trained in doing surgeries all day long. It stated that they don&#8217;t have the proper training to do OB Care with the patients. They don&#8217;t always provide the emotional care that the mother needs during the birthing process. Midwifes can fulfill this need more easily. The movie did not list any benefits about hospital births and is therefore very biased.  </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t appreciate seeing a lady compeletly nude in the bathtub. I understand that it is part of the birthing process but they didn&#8217;t need to show it in that way in the movie.</p>
<p>It stated that OBGYN&#8217;s don&#8217;t offer as personalized care as mid wive&#8217;s can. I think that depends on the individual mid wife and OB. In the movie the lady talked about having a midwife and and OB and her never thinking about going back to the OB. What I got out of this is that she had an impersonal OB and a personal midwife. </p>
<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Business of Being Born by B. Merritt</title>
		<link>http://overha.com/doc/093519/business/comment-page-1/#comment-9790</link>
		<dc:creator>B. Merritt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overha.com/doc/093519/business/#comment-9790</guid>
		<description>Informative? Sure. Gives a new perspective on a broken system? Definitely. Entertaining? Er ...not really. 
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;After talk-show host Ricki Lake experienced a bad childbirth in-hospital, she decided to try a midwife, and thus THE BUSINESS OF BEING BORN was ...um ...birthed. I can&#039;t help but think that some of this (not all) was a ploy by Lake to put herself back in the public eye; specifically, the movie industry. Although this is strictly a documentary, and other actors support various causes (from freeing Darfur to Tibetan independence), this one felt a bit more forced. 
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;The reason I say this is that the entire documentary was exceptionally boring and exceptionally lopsided. I work in the medical field (as an RN) but not in an Obstetrics setting. I can, however, vouch for the terrible cost of healthcare and some of the impersonalness of those giving it (as this documentary pointed out). I&#039;ve heard doctors talking about &quot;tee times&quot; on the golf course and the need to &quot;get home by dinner,&quot; so time is a big factor for physicians (the film pointed out that C-section deliveries peek at 4pm -- just prior to dinnertime -- and again at 10pm -- so doctors can get home to bed). Be damned whether the patient needs a C-section or not, doctors force the decision so that they can &quot;get on with their lives.&quot; Cut and run!
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;Even with its interesting take on the care of OB/Gyn patients in the U.S., the film never delves outside of the States even though certain statistics are presented (including telling us that the infant mortality rate in the U.S. is one of the highest amongst developed countries). I would&#039;ve liked to have seen at least one interview with a Japanese midwife or a European midwife, and have them show us how their system works. But we&#039;re never give the opportunity to see this for ourselves. 
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;The boring nature of the film is that it never really finds its focus. Although the title of it is The Business of Being Born, it focused more on the plight of midwives and their care of expectant mothers at home or in midwife clinics. We drive around with midwives, trot down the road with midwives, listen to midwives talk on the phone to patients, and get to watch a couple of in-home births. Then we start the entire process over again. 
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;And there&#039;s also a brief and confusing stint in which we learn one of the film&#039;s producers is pregnant and trying to decide on prenatal care. 
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;All-in-all it&#039;s an informative story, but one that might cause a few too many yawns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Informative? Sure. Gives a new perspective on a broken system? Definitely. Entertaining? Er &#8230;not really. </p>
<p>After talk-show host Ricki Lake experienced a bad childbirth in-hospital, she decided to try a midwife, and thus THE BUSINESS OF BEING BORN was &#8230;um &#8230;birthed. I can&#8217;t help but think that some of this (not all) was a ploy by Lake to put herself back in the public eye; specifically, the movie industry. Although this is strictly a documentary, and other actors support various causes (from freeing Darfur to Tibetan independence), this one felt a bit more forced. </p>
<p>The reason I say this is that the entire documentary was exceptionally boring and exceptionally lopsided. I work in the medical field (as an RN) but not in an Obstetrics setting. I can, however, vouch for the terrible cost of healthcare and some of the impersonalness of those giving it (as this documentary pointed out). I&#8217;ve heard doctors talking about &#8220;tee times&#8221; on the golf course and the need to &#8220;get home by dinner,&#8221; so time is a big factor for physicians (the film pointed out that C-section deliveries peek at 4pm &#8212; just prior to dinnertime &#8212; and again at 10pm &#8212; so doctors can get home to bed). Be damned whether the patient needs a C-section or not, doctors force the decision so that they can &#8220;get on with their lives.&#8221; Cut and run!</p>
<p>Even with its interesting take on the care of OB/Gyn patients in the U.S., the film never delves outside of the States even though certain statistics are presented (including telling us that the infant mortality rate in the U.S. is one of the highest amongst developed countries). I would&#8217;ve liked to have seen at least one interview with a Japanese midwife or a European midwife, and have them show us how their system works. But we&#8217;re never give the opportunity to see this for ourselves. </p>
<p>The boring nature of the film is that it never really finds its focus. Although the title of it is The Business of Being Born, it focused more on the plight of midwives and their care of expectant mothers at home or in midwife clinics. We drive around with midwives, trot down the road with midwives, listen to midwives talk on the phone to patients, and get to watch a couple of in-home births. Then we start the entire process over again. </p>
<p>And there&#8217;s also a brief and confusing stint in which we learn one of the film&#8217;s producers is pregnant and trying to decide on prenatal care. </p>
<p>All-in-all it&#8217;s an informative story, but one that might cause a few too many yawns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Business of Being Born by L. Martin</title>
		<link>http://overha.com/doc/093519/business/comment-page-1/#comment-9789</link>
		<dc:creator>L. Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overha.com/doc/093519/business/#comment-9789</guid>
		<description>Surely in this day and age the consumer is aware enough to understand that a documentary should in best case present an unbiased view of a situation.
&lt;br /&gt;So why is it that films like this are being made? 
&lt;br /&gt;LET ME ASSURE YOU THE ISSUES THAT ARE PRESENTED ARE EXTREEMLY IMPORTANT AND VALID!! However that way in which it is presented is going to frustrate anyone who likes to come to their own conclusions with out being beaten into the presenters point of view. I feel that this film could potentially harm the cause, by compounding the already existing stereotype of the hard arse and slightly ignorant feminist radical... Come on people let the facts to do the talking and grow the hell up...  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely in this day and age the consumer is aware enough to understand that a documentary should in best case present an unbiased view of a situation.<br />
<br />So why is it that films like this are being made?<br />
<br />LET ME ASSURE YOU THE ISSUES THAT ARE PRESENTED ARE EXTREEMLY IMPORTANT AND VALID!! However that way in which it is presented is going to frustrate anyone who likes to come to their own conclusions with out being beaten into the presenters point of view. I feel that this film could potentially harm the cause, by compounding the already existing stereotype of the hard arse and slightly ignorant feminist radical&#8230; Come on people let the facts to do the talking and grow the hell up&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why is BDSM in the mainstream media only shown as women being Dom to men? by Neil</title>
		<link>http://overha.com/doc/343512/society/mass-media/comment-page-1/#comment-9772</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overha.com/doc/343512/society/mass-media/#comment-9772</guid>
		<description>I don’t know why the difference, I find pictures of women holding a whip absolutely repulsive and I can think of many much more enjoyable things I would like to do with a woman.

I see previous answers have trotted out the great defence of BDSM, ‘people who don’t like it don’t understand’, are &#039;immature&#039; and even &#039;unenlightened&#039;. What arrogance!

I don’t like Paedophilia, is there something I am missing there too?

Just because people find BDSM repulsive, it doesn’t follow that they don’t understand. It’s perfectly valid to hold the opinion that someone who gets turned on by violent sex has got something wrong in their head.

The United Nations World Health Organisation categorises sexual sadism and sexual masochism as mental health and behavioural disorder in the international classification of diseases handbook (ICD10). Are they Immature and unenlightened too?

The whole thing boils down to the fact that some sad sacks who get turned on by abusing, humiliating and brutalising women have invented this mystical fabrication called BDSM which excuses the brutality in their eyes, and sadly in the eyes of some women.

If it wasn’t for a few people believing this nonsense, men who abuse to turn themselves on would be known by their true name

The accused.

Edit

Starlight

It’s worse than that.

I do understand. 

Why do I understand? Because I did find the person to inspire me. The one. And I know they felt the same way too but a friend introduced them to sadists and guess what? They ended up in an abusive relationship some sick sad sack who gets turned on humiliating abusing and brutalising women.

And before you jump to a conclusion, no they had no ‘Longing’ before sadism poisoned their mind. Quite the opposite In fact, we found it odd and slightly amusing when the subject of sadism came up. Long story short they got chatting to sadists, ironically when I raised concerns I was told that they felt &#039;safe&#039;, I was dumped, and the person I knew no longer existed. Why do you think this is?

My opinion is that sadism acts exactly like a cult, and recruited someone who had no interest in it, to make them the plaything of abusers. A piece of meat to be used and past on. Don’t you ever wonder why abusive relationships within sadism rarely last?

Yes sadism has lasted for centuries; it is named after the Marquis de Sade who first documented his warped desires. Someone I might add who spent most of his adult life in mental institutions and prison because his preferences where so offensive, as have many sadists throughout history.

So you see, its not a case of ‘not understanding’ (again) I understand perfectly what sadists are about. I have read all the dogma and all the excuses, however I use scepticism and I find it full of contradictions and deliberate deceit like all cults. 

That’s why I come here and give my opinion, every one is allowed to hold an opinion arn&#039;t they?

Except by cults that is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don’t know why the difference, I find pictures of women holding a whip absolutely repulsive and I can think of many much more enjoyable things I would like to do with a woman.</p>
<p>I see previous answers have trotted out the great defence of BDSM, ‘people who don’t like it don’t understand’, are &#8216;immature&#8217; and even &#8216;unenlightened&#8217;. What arrogance!</p>
<p>I don’t like Paedophilia, is there something I am missing there too?</p>
<p>Just because people find BDSM repulsive, it doesn’t follow that they don’t understand. It’s perfectly valid to hold the opinion that someone who gets turned on by violent sex has got something wrong in their head.</p>
<p>The United Nations World Health Organisation categorises sexual sadism and sexual masochism as mental health and behavioural disorder in the international classification of diseases handbook (ICD10). Are they Immature and unenlightened too?</p>
<p>The whole thing boils down to the fact that some sad sacks who get turned on by abusing, humiliating and brutalising women have invented this mystical fabrication called BDSM which excuses the brutality in their eyes, and sadly in the eyes of some women.</p>
<p>If it wasn’t for a few people believing this nonsense, men who abuse to turn themselves on would be known by their true name</p>
<p>The accused.</p>
<p>Edit</p>
<p>Starlight</p>
<p>It’s worse than that.</p>
<p>I do understand. </p>
<p>Why do I understand? Because I did find the person to inspire me. The one. And I know they felt the same way too but a friend introduced them to sadists and guess what? They ended up in an abusive relationship some sick sad sack who gets turned on humiliating abusing and brutalising women.</p>
<p>And before you jump to a conclusion, no they had no ‘Longing’ before sadism poisoned their mind. Quite the opposite In fact, we found it odd and slightly amusing when the subject of sadism came up. Long story short they got chatting to sadists, ironically when I raised concerns I was told that they felt &#8217;safe&#8217;, I was dumped, and the person I knew no longer existed. Why do you think this is?</p>
<p>My opinion is that sadism acts exactly like a cult, and recruited someone who had no interest in it, to make them the plaything of abusers. A piece of meat to be used and past on. Don’t you ever wonder why abusive relationships within sadism rarely last?</p>
<p>Yes sadism has lasted for centuries; it is named after the Marquis de Sade who first documented his warped desires. Someone I might add who spent most of his adult life in mental institutions and prison because his preferences where so offensive, as have many sadists throughout history.</p>
<p>So you see, its not a case of ‘not understanding’ (again) I understand perfectly what sadists are about. I have read all the dogma and all the excuses, however I use scepticism and I find it full of contradictions and deliberate deceit like all cults. </p>
<p>That’s why I come here and give my opinion, every one is allowed to hold an opinion arn&#8217;t they?</p>
<p>Except by cults that is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Business of Being Born by kprSoCal</title>
		<link>http://overha.com/doc/093519/business/comment-page-1/#comment-9788</link>
		<dc:creator>kprSoCal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overha.com/doc/093519/business/#comment-9788</guid>
		<description>There was great potential for this to have been a classic educational movie.  Instead of classy, it ended up as crass.  Most parents will probably be frustrated over the foul language used, to include the &quot;F-WORD&quot;.  It was not some minor interjection made by some on looking bystander.  It was Ricki Lake&#039;s choice word to describe the emotion of her labor experience.  It was also Abby Epstein&#039;s, the movie&#039;s director, choice word in the heat of her labor.  It could have easily been edited out.  If you&#039;re religious in any way, you will also probably be annoyed by the repeated use of &quot;oh my god&quot; throughout the documentary.  Lengthy clips of completely naked women delivering their children at home started to be a bit over kill.  The movie was 85 minutes, but it could have easily been condensed to about 25 minutes.  
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;I&#039;m a strong advocate of home delivery and the use of midwives, but I can not recommend this movie due to its unnecessary profanity and unnecessary &quot;lengthiness&quot;.  Trust me, if you&#039;re really interested in watching this movie; just see the 3 minute trailer.  It will give all the information you need without the added garbage featured in the movie.  
&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was great potential for this to have been a classic educational movie.  Instead of classy, it ended up as crass.  Most parents will probably be frustrated over the foul language used, to include the &#8220;F-WORD&#8221;.  It was not some minor interjection made by some on looking bystander.  It was Ricki Lake&#8217;s choice word to describe the emotion of her labor experience.  It was also Abby Epstein&#8217;s, the movie&#8217;s director, choice word in the heat of her labor.  It could have easily been edited out.  If you&#8217;re religious in any way, you will also probably be annoyed by the repeated use of &#8220;oh my god&#8221; throughout the documentary.  Lengthy clips of completely naked women delivering their children at home started to be a bit over kill.  The movie was 85 minutes, but it could have easily been condensed to about 25 minutes.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m a strong advocate of home delivery and the use of midwives, but I can not recommend this movie due to its unnecessary profanity and unnecessary &#8220;lengthiness&#8221;.  Trust me, if you&#8217;re really interested in watching this movie; just see the 3 minute trailer.  It will give all the information you need without the added garbage featured in the movie.<br /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why is BDSM in the mainstream media only shown as women being Dom to men? by Brian W</title>
		<link>http://overha.com/doc/343512/society/mass-media/comment-page-1/#comment-9771</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overha.com/doc/343512/society/mass-media/#comment-9771</guid>
		<description>It seems to me that men doms are much crueler or more sadistic. Women are much sexier and flirty and teasing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that men doms are much crueler or more sadistic. Women are much sexier and flirty and teasing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why is BDSM in the mainstream media only shown as women being Dom to men? by Don Raa</title>
		<link>http://overha.com/doc/343512/society/mass-media/comment-page-1/#comment-9770</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Raa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overha.com/doc/343512/society/mass-media/#comment-9770</guid>
		<description>I have seen more videos of male dominance(Men torturing women). Also I hate to see the opposite because there is nothing to watch. (I am talking about sexual bondage/BDSM videos.)

ANSWER: The reason should be the same as more women in porn movies than men. Because men spend lots of money for porn, therefore the industry normally target men. -&gt; Men like to see Men dominating women.

On the other hand women dominance is unrealistic even though these videos are made by using actors. 

It is kind of a SICK desire to watch these videos. (I can&#039;t resist it completely. Sometimes I like to watch them. But after watching them I feel sad about myself for watching them. The truth must be that we feel happy to watch women get tied and tortured. ). Also I have read that people who love bondage has sick mentality. Also I have heard that couples do organized bandage activities with pleasure. It is ok because both parties are enjoying it, but ...? I think there is something wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have seen more videos of male dominance(Men torturing women). Also I hate to see the opposite because there is nothing to watch. (I am talking about sexual bondage/BDSM videos.)</p>
<p>ANSWER: The reason should be the same as more women in porn movies than men. Because men spend lots of money for porn, therefore the industry normally target men. -> Men like to see Men dominating women.</p>
<p>On the other hand women dominance is unrealistic even though these videos are made by using actors. </p>
<p>It is kind of a SICK desire to watch these videos. (I can&#8217;t resist it completely. Sometimes I like to watch them. But after watching them I feel sad about myself for watching them. The truth must be that we feel happy to watch women get tied and tortured. ). Also I have read that people who love bondage has sick mentality. Also I have heard that couples do organized bandage activities with pleasure. It is ok because both parties are enjoying it, but &#8230;? I think there is something wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
